Saturday, August 1, 2009

Restructure our Structure


Change doesn’t come easy. I am starting to have a better understanding of this mantra as I look back on the historic efforts to preserve the salmon and their habitat. As the salmon population continues to decline and the environmental problems become seemingly more insurmountable, I am challenged by this track record.

This past week I have been brainstorming ways to engage various stakeholders, especially community members to create a more comprehensive and collaborative salmon recovery strategy. Through this process, it has occurred to me that our voices are mainly heard through agencies and organizations. Think about it, if you were interested in becoming involved or even voicing your opinion about something in which you feel passionately, you would either find a local organization to give money or volunteer time, contact a governmental agency to explain your position, or start your own movement. But what if you lived in area where such organization don’t exist, or time and money is not something you have to give, or you lack the resources to start your own organization? In fact, what if you don’t even have easy access to the internet to seek further information? Often these people are left behind and their voices and opinions are neglected.

Furthermore, organizations can often burn through volunteers because they are set up in a way that provides little to no return on investments made. Many organizations have agendas that shape the development of projects and the role of the volunteer then, most likely, becomes the implementation of such projects. Unless they are on the Board of Directors or the steering committee, volunteers have little to no say in the developmental process. It seems that some organizations, while trying to serve from the bottom up still employ the top down strategy.

Unfortunately time is becoming an increasingly important factor in solving our environmental problems, yet our ways of creating change seem slow and antiquated. Are we being constrained by our existing models of collaboration? Are our organizational models even set up to effectively serve all constituents? I think it is time to challenge our rules of engagement and our methods of organization to finds ways we can mobilize people faster, more efficiently, farther reaching, and on a broader more inclusive level.

6 comments:

  1. Very nice Jo, this is a very important thing to be aware of. When I started iLEAP, I wanted it to be a different kind of organization, one that was based in invitation rather than exclusion...but it isn't easy to go against the prevailing doxa of how we organize and, for iLEAP, how we are recognized.
    You may want to look into taking an Org Psych class for one of your electives. Perhaps Jean Singer's Organizational Dynamics.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jo, you have expressed so well how I feel in my research and taking action. At times it becomes an ominous task yet the passion still drives me forward - slowly. When I seek out like minds in an organization (People for Puget Sound) I feel a power structure that is rigid and question if that is the place to expend time and energy. It's like - where can I fit in to make a meaningful difference? We should take this Org Psych class together - for us and the salmon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jo,

    I read this post with a lot of interest due to my experiences of both being a volunteer and community organizer in the past few years. Indeed, how do organizations seek to engage people, whether they are volunteers, paid staff or board members? I've taken three courses from Jean Singer, and wonder if the one that Britt mentions might be the Group Dynamics and Facilitation course. The other one that would more closely teach principles of how we engage folks in egalitarian ways is Overview of Organizational Development, I just had that course last quarter and greatly enjoyed it.

    Joyce



    Do we genuinely seek to involve and engage people in our organizations in democratic ways, or is just about the organization's agenda that just a few people created?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good question Jo. It seems to me that if we "structured" organizations as if they were living systems (open to flows of materials and energy, self-organizing and autopoeitic) we might actually get somewhere. De-centralized, distributed groups, who leverage the interdependencies among us, and are locally attuned and responsive make a lot more sense to me than the way we're organizing ourselves now. Think of the energy that could be released!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I feel the same way. What I am learning in my Participatory Communication class seems to fit here, as does what we have learned in leadership and studying organizations and change in past quarters. In her book, Slow is beautiful, there is some wonderful information on how communities can work, etc. http://www.cecileandrews.com/

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm really looking forward to seeing where this takes you. Interesting stuff!

    ReplyDelete